While privacy advocates decry
fingerprinting as an abuse of privacy, many see it as a cheaper, more accurate
way to verify identity. In addition, fingerprinting technology is far more
robust than cookies and ink. Read on for why this technology is better for
ensuring your identity.
It's Easier to Apply For
A Digital Fingerprinting Check is easier to apply if you have one of these services. It is a way to reduce the processing time of fingerprinting. The process starts by filing all required documents online and paying the administrative fee.
Once you've done that, you
can schedule an appointment to have your fingerprints taken. This can usually
be done in seven days or less.
Another advantage of digital fingerprinting is that you only need to take your fingerprints once compared to the standard ink version. As with the traditional ink method, you can submit your fingerprints to multiple states. Also, you can save your fingerprints in the system of the digital fingerprinting company.
However, this option is only available in some states. For employment in regulated industries, a digital fingerprint check is frequently necessary. The state-specific fingerprinting requirements may change depending on your industry.
In any case,
fingerprint background checks can assist you in improving workplace safety,
reducing risk, expanding your security footprint, and protecting the customer
data you are entrusted with.
Privacy Advocates Say Fingerprinting is Abusive
Digital fingerprinting is a tracking form
involving determining a device's characteristics. This can be done on mobile
devices, computers, and apps. This tracking process occurs invisibly in the
background. As such, fingerprinting is more complex to detect than a web
cookie. But privacy advocates claim that fingerprinting is an abuse of user
privacy.
Apple and other tech companies have been called on to develop technological solutions for fingerprint applications.
For
example, their iCloud Plus subscription service will obscure iPhone users' IP
addresses from Web trackers, often the key to app fingerprinting. But in the
meantime, iPhone users' privacy is in the hands of data companies and app
developers.
It's Cheaper Than Ink
Digital fingerprinting is more precise,
cleaner, and faster than traditional ink fingerprinting. It is now required for
specific occupations in most states. It is also used by many non-profit
organizations and daycare centers.
Livescan digital fingerprinting is the
next generation of fingerprint technology. It allows fingerprint images to be
sent electronically to multiple agencies. The cost is lower than ink
fingerprinting, and many industries and government agencies accept the livescan
fingerprinting procedure. It is also more affordable than traditional
fingerprinting.
One disadvantage of digital
fingerprinting is that you must retake fingerprints every time you apply for a
license in a different state. Unlike ink fingerprinting, you cannot use the
same fingerprints in more than one state. However, some digital fingerprinting
companies store fingerprints in their systems for later use.
It's More Accurate
Digital fingerprinting is a way of identifying a user's device. It is similar to strip searches used in airports but is much more accurate. Digital fingerprinting can help banks and businesses probe into suspicious online behavior.
It can also identify botnets and hacker
attempts. Botnets are connected to a network of computers through the Internet,
and one type of bot manager uses a browser fingerprinting service to identify
the usual user of a particular website.
The digital fingerprint of a user in particular, and there is almost no way that two individuals with identical fingerprints can be found. This is because browser configurations will differ even for the same device model.
Browser fingerprinting works by collecting many
data points from a user and then combining this with web cookies to form a more
detailed user profile. This improved tracking method enables publishers and
advertisers to serve more relevant advertisements to consumers.
It's More Robust Than Cookies
Digital fingerprinting is an increasingly
popular alternative to cookies and can help advertisers fill in the marketing
gaps that cookies cannot provide. The technology uses a server-side database to
store device data for future use. It also has the advantage of not violating
privacy laws. The GDPR lists some information gathered by device fingerprinting
as personal data.
A fingerprint is more difficult to erase than a cookie and is more persistent. Its unique traits remain even if users change their browser's software or settings. This makes it easier to track the user's movements across the web. A recent study by the EFF found that it was easy to identify people with fingerprinting even if they deleted their cookies.