Regression Testing in Manual Testing

 

Do you know how it feels to update your program or app a lot and then cross your fingers that nothing goes wrong? Regression testing enters the picture like a superhero at that point. It basically amounts to double-checking your work to ensure that previously functioning components haven't been affected by fresh upgrades or fixes. And here's the thing: no fancy automated tools are required—though those can be useful too—all of this is done manually. Now, get a cup of coffee, turn on your testing setup, and let's explore regression testing together!

What is Regression Testing in Manual Testing?

When it comes to manual testing, regression testing is the practice of running previously run test cases again to make sure that new alterations or updates to the software program haven't negatively impacted the features that are already in place. 

Just like in Hi Tech and Manufacturing Service, software development and maintenance are essential since it find any unanticipated side effects or flaws brought about by upgrades or new code changes. Manual regression testing entails carrying out test cases, comparing the results with the expected outcomes, and carefully examining any anomalies in order to verify the software's functionality. 

Its goal is to verify that the program continues to function as intended in the wake of changes, guaranteeing that the application's quality and stability are upheld throughout its lifecycle. Furthermore, manual regression testing ensures the software's durability and dependability by enabling testers to find any problems that might have been introduced during development or missed during early testing stages.

Is Regression Testing in Manual Testing Required? 

• Early Regression Issue Detection: 

Regression testing's capacity to find and diagnose regression problems early in the software development lifecycle is one of its main advantages. After every addition to the codebase or change to functionality, manual testers retest the previously established features to identify any unintended side effects or flaws introduced by the revisions. 

• Preventing Bug Regression: 

Regression testing aids in preventing the recurrence of problems or bugs that have already been fixed. There's always a chance that adding new features or altering current ones could unintentionally bring back outdated flaws or interfere with functionality. Testing for regressions manually makes sure that these regressions are discovered before they affect end users.

• Providing Integration and Compatibility: 

Software systems frequently depend on a variety of third-party services, libraries, APIs, and component parts. Regression testing makes sure that these integrations hold up and continue to work even when there are modifications to the code. Manual testers can confirm compatibility with multiple operating systems, browsers, devices, and environments, guaranteeing a consistent user experience on a range of platforms.

• Sustaining Software Quality and Reliability:

Constant regression testing helps to keep the software product's overall quality and dependability intact. Manual testers make sure the program satisfies quality standards and performance benchmarks by repeatedly verifying the application's behavior against predetermined criteria and user expectations. Regular testing procedures reduce the possibility of important problems finding their way into production and negatively affecting customer satisfaction by assisting in the early detection and resolution of flaws.

• Encouraging Change Management and Continuous Integration: 

Software is updated and changed frequently in environments prioritizing agile and continuous delivery. Regression testing is essential for supporting change management since it gives information about how changes affect already-existing functionalities. Manual testers check that improved features or additions meet project specifications and don't negatively impact system stability as a whole.

• Reducing Overall Testing Costs: 

Although manual regression testing may appear labor-intensive, the advantages it offers in terms of guaranteeing product stability and averting expensive post-release issues far outweigh the expenses involved. In later phases of development, manual testing helps minimize the need for lengthy debugging, rework, and emergency solutions by minimizing regressions and discovering errors early.

Which are the various QA Companies providing regression testing in manual testing?

• TestRail: 

This all-in-one platform for managing test cases has the ability to perform regression testing. It lets you record test results over time and build, manage, and test cases. TestRail is appropriate for teams of all sizes because it integrates with a variety of problem-tracking and test automation solutions. 

• Selenium: 

A well-known open-source program for automating web browsers is called Selenium. Its compatibility with other programming languages, including Python, C#, and Java, enables testers to build reliable regression test suites for web applications. WebDriver API from Selenium is a vital tool for web regression testing because it allows interactions with web elements.

• QMetry: 

With tools for regression testing, Qmetry is a feature-rich test management software. It provides a number of features, including reporting, test case execution, and design. Qmetry is appropriate for agile and DevOps contexts because it integrates with common issue-tracking systems and test automation tools. 

• Applause: 

Applause is a crowdsourcing platform that works with a global network of qualified testers to offer Software regression testing services. Businesses can access real-world testing scenarios on a range of devices, operating systems, and locations using Applause. In addition to ensuring thorough regression test coverage, this offers insightful information about the user experience.

• Tricentis Tosca: 

Tricentis Tosca is an enterprise-class product for test automation that includes features for regression testing. It provides a model-based method for automating tests, enabling testers to easily automate complicated test scenarios and produce reusable test assets. Regression test results can be tracked with Tricentis Tosca's sophisticated reporting features, which interface with major CI/CD platforms. 

• Katalon Studio: 

Test automation for web and mobile applications is made possible using Katalon Studio, a potent tool. Regression testing is included in the extensive feature set it provides for both automated and manual testing. Katalon Studio is appropriate for teams with different levels of technical skill since it offers an easy-to-use interface for writing test scripts, organizing test suites, and producing thorough test results.

How many kinds of regression testing in manual testing are there?  

Regression testing is a crucial step in the software testing process that makes sure that any updates or modifications to an application won't adversely affect its current functioning. Regression testing of many kinds is used in manual testing services to verify the software's functionality following changes. The following list of six typical regression test types includes a brief overview of each:

• Complete Regression Testing: 

Comprises running each test case in the test suite again to make sure that no new flaws have been introduced and that the functionality that is already in place is unaffected. Regression testing of this kind takes a lot of time and resources, but it thoroughly validates the program as a whole. 

• Selective Regression Testing: 

Focuses on retesting the program just in the areas affected or changed by recent modifications. Critical and high-impact regions of the application are prioritized while choosing test cases, which is based on risk assessments. Since this method just focuses on particular capabilities, it requires less time and effort than full regression testing.

• Testing for Unit Regression: 

Focuses on testing specific software application modules or units after modifications have been performed. Unit regression testing is a common practice among developers to make sure that changes to the code don't affect already-existing functionality. By assisting in the early detection and correction of flaws, it lessens the possibility that problems may spread to later testing stages. 

• Testing for Partial Regression: 

Involves retesting a portion of the test cases from the full test suite with an emphasis on particular features or functions. Test cases are chosen according to how well they reflect current modifications or updates. While not as comprehensive as complete regression testing, this testing strikes a compromise between quickness and thoroughness.

• Progressive Regression Testing: 

Regression testing is incorporated into the software development lifecycle to regularly confirm how new changes affect functionality that has already been implemented. As new features or updates are added, test cases are run progressively to make sure regressions are found and fixed quickly. Agile development techniques are facilitated and early fault detection is encouraged by progressive regression testing. 

• Data-Driven Regression Testing: 

Focuses on verifying the behavior of the software using various input data types. To make sure that the application works properly in a variety of circumstances, test cases are created to cover a range of data possibilities. Regression testing of this kind assists in identifying problems with data that might occur from modifications to code or configuration.

Regression testing comes in a variety of forms, each with a distinct function and adaptability to the demands of the software development project. Combining several ways of regression testing might aid in obtaining thorough test coverage and guarantee the stability and dependability of the software program.

Conclusion

In manual testing, regression testing is essential to guarantee the stability and dependability of software systems. It helps uncover any unexpected repercussions of code changes by methodically retesting updated or modified functionalities, hence reducing the possibility of introducing new bugs. Even though it takes longer and requires more work, manual regression testing is still the most thorough because it enables testers to use their judgment and domain knowledge to identify small problems that automated tests could miss.